In June of this year members of a statewide police task force were conducting a commercial sexual exploitation investigation in various cities. Undercover officers posing as prostitutes placed listings online designed to reveal people seeking sexual services for a fee. The operation lasted several days. On June 7, our client responded to the listing and arranged for sex for a specific fee. He entered the location identified and was met by a woman.
The two discussed the final fee and the act she was to perform. Unknown to our client this woman was the undercover police officer. Our client was released and summonsed for a clerk magistrate hearing charging him with sex for a fee in violation of G. Today, Attorney Neyman convinced the clerk magistrate not to issue the complaint. Read More in Sex Crimes. Our client is a military veteran who currently works in a local city for its department of public works. In February of this year he went to a location well known for prostitution.
He propositioned a woman and negotiated a fee for oral sex. Unbeknownst to the man, the woman was an undercover police officer posing as a prostitute. Our client was identified and summonsed for a clerk magistrate hearing charging him with soliciting sex for a fee in violation of G. Attorney Neyman represented him at the clerk's hearing.
He convinced the clerk magistrate not to issue the complaint given our client's military service and his exemplary employment history. Read More in Sex For a Fee. In June of this year our client, an Uber driver, went online and made arrangements to have sex with a woman claiming to be a prostitute.
The two met up in an apartment building. Our client entered a designated room and negotiated a sexual arrangement for a specified amount of money.
