I've been thinking that recommending more people to read ratfic would be unusually good for policy efforts, since it's something very socially acceptable for high-minded people to do in their free time, should have a big impact through extant orgs without costing any additional money, and it's not weird or awkward in the slightest to talk about the original source if a conversation gets anyone interested in going deeper into where they got the idea from. But unlike you, I don't have much of a track record making judgments about big decisions like this and then seeing how they play out over years in complicated systems.
The LessWrong Review runs every year to select the posts that have most stood the test of time. This post is not yet eligible for review, but will be at the end of The top fifty or so posts are featured prominently on the site throughout the year.
Hopefully, the review is better than karma at judging enduring value. If we have accurate prediction markets on the review results, maybe we can have better incentives on LessWrong today. Will this post make the top fifty? Jaan Tallinn's Philanthropy Overview. Jaan Tallinn's Philanthropy Overview 70 ektimo. New Comment. On behalf of humanity, thank you. Reply 1. Thank you for making so much possible. Moderation Log. Cooperative AI Foundation. Alignment Research Center. Center for Applied Rationality.
General support for Lightcone Infrastructure. General support for Manifold Markets. Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters. Carnegie Mellon University. Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab. Massachusetts Institute of Tech. Center for Artificial Intelligence Safety.
